|
The major objective and underlying theme of the project is to take an unbiased look at the technological advances that are employed by the fisheries markets. The social, environmental, and economic of the exploitation of the fisheries market will be examined in order to enhance our company's knowledge of the socio-economic effects that aquaculture and the fishing industry has while at the same time taking into consideration the environmental impacts that the industry imparts in North eastern England.
Our company believes that as a whole England's fisheries and
aquaculture remediation plan is very well assembled and only have a few
suggestions.
• The governmental monitoring system is well planned, however it
would be more beneficial to have a separate monitoring agency that
reports to the government in order to remain unbiased.
• Remediation of the Tyne river is a encouraging example of
environmental recovery, however the best solution is the prevention of
degradation in the first place. Close monitoring and strict regulations
are paramount.
• The regulations for the destruction of spawning grounds and
suitable habitat for industrial purposes should be strengthened to
discourage this activity.
• Develop a nation-wide fisheries monitoring system to keep track of the current populations of specific keystone species.
• Finally, increase and encourage public interaction in the
regulating and environmental monitoring of the nation's bodies of water
to instill a feeling of personal stake in the state of the country's
natural landscape.
TERMS OF REFERENCE
In order to make a proper assessment of the impacts that the
fishing and aquaculture industries are having on the environment of
north-east England and the surrounding environments, it is necessary to
define the particular facts and information that has resulted as a
direct effect of the fisheries industry.
Social
To assess the social impacts that the fishing industry has had on
north-east England information concerning the local demographic of the
area needs to be gathered. This includes the average age of the
residents, places of employment, types of recreation, typical workweek,
etc. All of this information may be collected either via census
procedures or by making estimations from earlier demographic data.
Economic
The economic impacts of the fisheries industry are widespread, but in
order to quantify the actual impacts on the economy of England there
are specific areas that should be assessed. The average household
income, cost of living, and economic fluctuations are all very telling
characteristics of the impacts made by the economic industries of an
area and would all need to be examined to determine how the fishing
industry was helping/hurting the economy of north-east England. This
information can be gathered by reviewing the economic reviews of the
area for the past several years and looking at the financial reports
for that area to determine trends, fluctuations, etc.
Environmental
Finally, possibly the most important impacts that could be taking place
would be the environmental impacts that aquaculture and its
subsidiaries are having in England. The negative impacts that take
place are well documented and show up quite frequently in the primary
literature journals, mostly due to the high level of regulation and
monitoring that takes place now in the aquaculture industry. It is
unfair to simply assume that all impacts that are going to be sustained
by the environment will be negative. In order to provide an unbiased
opinion, our company would need to perform several environmental tests
on and near the sites of aquaculture in England. These tests would
include procedures like water quality monitoring, water table
monitoring, invasive species surveys, and chemical deposition testing.
By compiling the information gathered from these tests and through
casual observation, an opinion of the actual impacts of the fisheries
industry in north-east England may be formed.
INTRODUCTION
The subjects of the fisheries and aquaculture industries are not new
topics. There is evidence available that suggests that the Romans
cultivated many species of fish, with China and Egypt having very old,
well-documented legacies of aquaculture (Ager 2005). In many areas of
the world, aquaculture is a fairly new development since up until
recently most countries could sustain their populations solely by
active fishing (Ager 2005). The increasing population has given the
food industry a renewed importance with a need for scientific
development in order to make meaningful advances in food production.
Aquaculture itself is a major economic factor in many southeast Asian
countries like China and Japan, since a large portion of the diets of
this ethnicity is made up of fish and other creatures of the seas (Ager
2005). Aquaculture also provides jobs in countries that otherwise
would be “resource-poor” in the worldwide race for economic
prosperity. Developed countries such as Great Britain, parts of
Europe, and the United States also practice aquaculture, but at a
lesser degree than do other parts of the world. This could be due to
the absence of fish as a major staple food in the diets of these parts
of the world, but could also be attributed to these countries in large
part being more landlocked than some parts of Asia, Japan, and China.
On the other hand, fishing has been an activity that most if not all
forms of indigenous peoples have partaken in at some point in time for
survival. This ranges from the Native Americans of North America to
the Inuit tribes in the Arctic regions. Many countries continue to
support fishing as a major industry of food production as well as
economic health, since the trading of fish in the Asian market can be
very prosperous.
The fisheries market and its subsidiaries form a large network of
economic growth and expansion worldwide. England is not a newcomer to
the market, however its fish market does not have the backing that
other larger “fish-dependent” countries are able to provide to their
markets. In the past, various practices and procedures were adopted
that allowed a larger harvest of fish and less expenditures, which
translates into a larger profit. However, some of these practices were
not beneficial to the environment and have had significant detrimental
impacts on certain ecosystems. Today there are more regulations,
higher agency and governmental expectations, and higher levels of
monitoring so that our natural ecosystems may be preserved for future
generations. This study examines the impacts that have taken place
thus far, and strives to make recommendations in order for the negative
impacts of tomorrow's fisheries industries to be lessened.
1.0 Aquaculture: Historical practices and their impacts
There are four main categories of aquaculture present in Britain and
Ireland. They are: finfish (Salmon, Trout, Turbot, etc.), shellfish
(mussels, oysters, and scallops), seaweeds (dulse:Palmaria palmata),
and worms (the King Ragworm) (Ager 2005). The cultivation techniques
are unique for each type and are outlined below in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1
Type of Aquaculture Facts Time Period
Salmon Cultivation Practiced in Scotland since the 1960's. Has
both freshwater and seawater life cycles. Begins in holding pens in
freshwater until smolt stage is reached. Then transferred to large
saltwater suspended net cages.
1-2 years
Mussel Cultivation Divided into two types: On-bottom and Off-bottom
farming. On-bottom: the mussels are taken from area of high
concentration and spread out to allow maximum growth. Off-bottom:
mussels are grown on ropes or rods suspended in a body of water. Both
processes require a natural “seed source” for the mussels.
1 year or lessDulse Long-line techniques. Dulse plants are
transplanted from original location to ropes suspended in the ocean via
a long-line and left to grow.
2-3 yearsKing Ragworm production Concentrated in the
north-east of England. Used as bait and food staple for other cultured
species. Variety of techniques employed including controlled food
input, large production of juveniles, and utilizing waste heat from
industrial practices to keep the seawater medium at the optimum
temperature.
Less than 1 year
North east England is mainly an area of “bait” aquaculture or the
production of baitfish for the
feeding of or fishing for other, larger sought after species (Milner et
al. 2004). While this area of England may not be producing dietary
staples for humans, it provides the rest of the fisheries industry with
the material needed to sustain the level of aquaculture that
populations demand.
It is evident that the fisheries industry provides necessary resources,
ranging from dietary staples to economic fortitude, to many countries
of the world. However, what are the impacts of these processes. Does
the intervention of humans into the natural cycle and growth pattern of
aqueous creatures have any negative impacts on the environment? On
economics or society? Many studies have shown that aquaculture can have
significant negative impacts on the environment and can also cause
large scale economic and social changes.
1.1 Aquaculture: Negative Impacts
Nutrient Enrichment Aquaculture, by necessity forces as
many of a particular species of organism in cultivation into as small
an area as possible so that production may be increased while keeping
costs down. In essence this is harmless, however the biological
material and feces released by the population of organisms increases
the nutrient gradient of the pool of water. This increases the
production of algal organisms and has the potential to cause the
eutrophocation of the body of water. Nitrogen and phosphorous are both
known limiting factors in aqueous environments but in a closed body of
water such as an aquaculture fish pool these nutrients are added in the
form of uneaten fish food, making toxic algal blooms a concern
(citation).
Chemical Pollution In certain types of aquaculture it is
necessary to utilize certain chemicals, whether they be fertilizers or
lice treatments (Ager 2005). The addition of these chemicals to the
water column can lead to effects on the native aqueous species of the
area being cultivated. The added chemicals have the potential to kill
or cause harm to the native organisms that are present in the water
column and can even persist for a long period of time, causing problems
much later than the release time (Ager 2005).
Impacts on Native Populations If a cultivated organism were
to escape from an aquaculture pond and breed with a native species of
organism, the genetic effects could be very detrimental (Ager 2005).
Aquaculture bred organisms usually come from a few individual organisms
and through a process known as “the Founder Effect”, tend to be very
genetically similar to one another and to their descendants. This
makes the population more susceptible to disease and parasitism than a
natural, genetically diverse community. If a cultivated organism were
to breed and spread this unique set of genes to the native population
of a certain area, the effects could be a loss of genetic diversity in
the natural population leading to more disease and death in the native
population.
Impacts on the environment In some cases aquaculture
entails the addition of natural inputs such as medium or other
organisms as a food source for the cultivated species (Ager 2005).
This can lead to the depletion of certain resources that are needed for
the balance of the natural ecosystem (Ager 2005). For example, the
sand eel population has declined considerably due to industrial fishing
in the North Sea (Ager 2005). Since, the eels are a keystone species in
this ecosystem this has caused a major shift in the biological
diversity of this region (Ager 2005).
Invasive Species The detrimental effects that non-native
invasive species can have on undisturbed natural habitat is well
documented. Some species that are cultivated in aquaculture settings
are not native to the area in which the aquaculture takes place. There
is the potential for the escape of the species into the surrounding
landscape and then for that species to act as a non-native invader
causing biodiversity changes, nutrient cycling changes, and environment
structure changes (Ager 2005).
2.0 Fishing PracticesFishing practices have not changed
much since man first started searching for food except for the amount
of harvest that is possible now. Most of England's fishing takes place
off of the coastal shores, with a small amount of native fish being
taken from inland practices. The processes that are employed by the
fisherman are less important that the numbers of fish that are taken.
There has been a vast increase in the harvest rate of fish in recent
years due to technological advances and an increase of fishing
pressure. The effects that this has had on the fish populations are
evident. Humans are harvesting the fish at an unsustainable rate and
the natural reproduction of the fish cannot keep up. The populations
of fish species are not the only organisms suffering however. In many
cases the reduction of a particular fish species creates a food
shortage for another organism and opens up resources yet another. What
this means is that the natural fluctuations of community populations
are being thrown off by the fishing industry. This creates community
wide species composition changes as well as a potential breakdown of
important marine environments.
Anglers in England spend approximately 3 billion pounds a year
supporting their sport, so the social and economic impacts of fishing
are very considerable, however in some cases (as in our case study)
this has led to the destruction of natural environmentally important
ecosystems (Milner et al. 2004).
3.0 Case Study: The decline of Salmon in the Tyne
The Tyne river is a major fishery site in north-eastern England. In
the 1950's the native salmon species population declined dramatically
and were all but wiped out by 1960. This is mainly attributed to the
destruction of estuarine water quality by the use of open sewer systems
and lack of filtration systems. From 1960 to 1980 there were dramatic
increases in the development of water quality technologies and the Tyne
was restored to near normal water conditions. This period began the
reintroduction of native Salmon back into the estuary by natural
processes. It was not until the Kielder reservoir was built that human
introduction of Salmon began to take place in an effort to increase the
natural population. Today, the Tyne boasts the largest rod catch of
native Salmon species in all of England. This has mainly been
attributed to the natural movement of Salmon back into the newly
restored estuary, but the introduction of Salmon by humans has also
been cited as a contributing factor.
Conclusions and recommendations
The fisheries and aquaculture industries play a major role in shaping
north-eastern England's social, economic, and environmental trends.
There has been a renewed interest in environmentally friendly
technology and practices in recent years, which is encouraging for the
future outlook of the fisheries industry. The adoption of sustainable
fish harvesting techniques insures that in the future England's economy
will remain stable while maintaining the natural balance of organisms
in the environment as well.
Our company believes that as a whole England's fisheries and
aquaculture remediation plan is very well assembled and only have a few
suggestions.
• The governmental monitoring system is well planned, however it
would be more beneficial to have a separate monitoring agency that
reports to the government in order to remain unbiased.
• Remediation of the Tyne river is a encouraging example of
environmental recovery, however the best solution is the prevention of
degradation in the first place. Close monitoring and strict regulations
are paramount.
• The regulations for the destruction of spawning grounds and
suitable habitat for industrial purposes should be strengthened to
discourage this activity.
• Develop a nation-wide fisheries monitoring system to keep track of the current populations of specific keystone species.
• Finally, increase and encourage public interaction in the
regulating and environmental monitoring of the nation's bodies of water
to instill a feeling of personal stake in the state of the country's
natural landscape.
References
Ager, O. 2005. Aquaculture. Main Life Topic Note:MarLIN. pg. 1-5
Clarke, D. 2002. Comments from the Environment Agency on the scoping of
the Environmental Effects of Marine Fisheries Study. Royal
Commission on Environmental Pollution. pg. 1-5.
Milner, N.J., Russell, I.C., Aprihamian, M., Inverarity, R., Shelley,
J., and Rippon, P. 2004. The role of stocking in the recovery of the
River Tyne Salmon Fisheries. Fisheries Technical Report number
2004/1. Environment Agency. pg. 1-68.
Parr, J., Hiscock, K., and Lear, D. 2004. Scoping study and
infrastructure development: UK Seabed biology datasets access
programme. Report to the UK National Biodiversity Network and the
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. pg. 1-53.
|