Login

Perceived Risk: How real are people’s fears of purchasing over on-line shop?

Along with the rapid growth of E-Commerce as an effective tool for conducting business activities through the World Wide Web, there has also been increasing concern about one of the biggest considered hindrance to the growth of E-Commerce as well: the security aspects of E-Commerce. Reports suggest that the rate of internet adoption is fairly high and is increasing with every passing year.

E-commerce usage is also on the rise but unfortunately the rate of E-commerce adoption is by no means doing justice to the real potential of Internet. The literature suggested security and privacy risk to be the main obstacle towards the realisation of e-commerce’s full potential.  It is this aspect of E-Commerce or internet shopping on which, the dissertation will be focussing on. The objective of this study is to investigate and find out how real are these threats to the consumer while they are purchasing online.

The literature review enabled the researcher to understand the various concepts of e-commerce, security as well as privacy threats in online environments, internet crime, and perceived risks associated with e-commerce and the concept of trust. But, any business model does not prove valid by merely analysing it in the theoretical framework; since the commercial world is governed by the attitudes and behaviour of humans, which are not alike for all. The research design helped the dissertation to judge the attitudes, knowledge and concern of the Internet users over the security issues in E-Commerce. For this purpose the researcher developed an online questionnaire to collect data regarding the consumers risk perception of internet shopping. The questionnaire was distributed primarily in the north east region of the UK.
The responses from the survey revealed that security and privacy concerns are indeed the most important factors that affect the consumer’s decision to purchase products online. This finding is in agreement to what is suggested in the literature. The study also revealed that low level of trust increased the risk perception of the consumer towards an online shop. Hence it is very important for the online vendors to try and make their system as secure as possible and convey the same to the consumer through security seals or security and privacy policies. As the level of trust increases between the consumers and the online merchants risk perception will gradually decrease and e-commerce will indeed prosper and meet its full potential.


2. Introduction


2.1 Introduction


In the late nineties the most popular phenomenon in the business world was to set up website on the internet for conducting business. E-Commerce was the buzzword with which every business wanted to associate itself and dot com was the means to achieve it. It is a shift to a whole new economy where old rules apply in a very different manner (Rosenbloom, 2002). The reason for the dot com boom can be attributed to the fact that many investors around the world made an initial bid to establish themselves in the new E-Commerce world by reaping the benefits of the technology (Ernest and Young, 2000). E-commerce introduces incredible benefits, such as the diffusion of information, the development of new technologies, the promotion and sales of products and services, and the collaboration between those in a supply chain. However, as it has grown and become an important tool for some, a majority of people are still reluctant in indulging in this recent phenomenon.
It is not argued that consumers are not browsing through e-commerce sites altogether, that figure is increasing however the number of people that actually purchase from these e-commerce sites is low. According to Blythe (1997), the biggest barrier to e-commerce growth is not technology, but people’s attitude towards it. Consumers are still finding it difficult to trust the online world as an entity. For e-commerce to become a viable market place, the public must trust the internet. The future success of e-commerce will be dependant not only on forging initial trust, but also on developing long term relationships to facilitate confidence and credibility. Research suggests that online sellers have made successful efforts to increase customer’s confidence and usage of shopping online through the improvement of security performance and privacy protection. Companies like eBay and Amazon.com illustrate successful examples of e-shopping which are argued benefit from a successful brand building strategy increasing customer loyalty. As a result it is suggested that online shopping has become and will continue to become a full and effective business model, (Black, 2005).
Till now, there has been much research looking into factors that attract consumers to shop online (Mehta and Sivadas, 1995 and Donthu and Garcia, 1999). Most of these researches have concentrated on the benefits that attract consumers to shop online, which are offered by B2C e-commerce stores (Joines et al. 2003). Given the rapid growth of the Internet as a new retail medium and the lack of empirical research addressing perceived risk associated with Internet shopping, a number of unanswered questions remain. What types of risk are perceived by Internet shoppers who have bought product/service online, and by browsers who have browsed for but not purchased product/service online to be potential barriers to making purchases on the Internet?

This study attempts to add to the existing literature (Mitchell, 1999, Hoffmam et al, 1999 and Jacobs, 1997) by looking at how consumer perception of risk in online shopping have impacted on their expectations and goes on to suggest how online stores may need to improve if they are to meet these new expectations.


2.2 Aims and Objectives


It is clear from the introduction that electronic commerce is becoming increasingly important to both corporations and individuals as a result of the dramatic development of technology and the emergency of a global economy. The expansion of the usage of the Internet by organisations and people is one of the main contributors to the development of e-commerce in terms of e-shopping, electronic business and internet commerce. However, as it has grown and become an important tool for some, a majority of people are still reluctant in indulging in this recent phenomenon. The main aim of the study will be to find out how real are the fears in terms of security and privacy for the consumers while shopping online.
The objectives of the study will be to.
• Understand and identify various issues related to e-commerce
• Identify the types of security and privacy threats in the online shopping environment
• Understand the concepts of perceived risks and trust in relation to internet shopping
• Examine whether the identified threats and perceived risks from the literature are similar to those of the consumers


2.3 Overview of the subsequent chapters


The entire dissertation is divided into sub parts as explained below:
Chapter 3 Literature review: This chapter presents an extensive summary of the literature review conducted by the researcher. The chapter has been subdivided into four sub sections dealing with e-commerce issues, internet crime and security issues, perceived risks and the concept of trust. A research hypothesis is formulated at the end of this chapter based on the literature review.
Chapter 4 Research Methodology: This chapter outlines the various paradigm and approaches that were reviewed by the researcher before adopting a particular paradigm or approach. This section also elaborates the research instrument used for the primary research in the form of a questionnaire.
Chapter 5 Research Analysis: This chapter provides a detailed analysis from the responses of the survey conducted using the questionnaire. The chapter is subdivided as per the questionnaire so that the results can be co-related. Graphs and tables have been used to elaborate the results. A brief summary of the findings are presented at the end of the chapter.   
Chapter 6 Conclusion and Further work: This chapter presents the conclusive findings from the study. It also provides shows whether the formulated hypotheses was correct or not. Depending on this appropriate conclusions are drawn. The researcher also includes few limitations of the study and suggests further work that may be carried.


 
3. Literature Review


This chapter summarizes and critically appraises the relative strengths and weaknesses of the ideas expressed in the literature associated with the subject area of Internet shopping and its perceived risks. Recent research suggests that online shopping has become and will continue to become a full and effective business model (Black, 2005). Through investigation of various texts on e-commerce and internet shopping the author of this report is of the view that the available literature is very diverse and needs careful review to achieve full understanding behind the various associated concepts.
The first section of this chapter provides a general overview and discussion on e-commerce, providing a background to the study and building the foundation of the research. The following section provides a deeper insight into perceived risks, security and privacy in association with internet shopping.


3.1 Electronic Commerce


3.1.1 Definition


Electronic commerce may be defined as “the sharing of business information, maintaining business relationships, and conducting business transactions by means of telecommunications networks” [Zwass, 1998].  It may also be defined as a “potent socio-economic chemical that reacts with everything it touches” (Kalakota & Robinson, 2001). Kenney & Curry (2001) state, one of the most remarkable things about the Internet has been the massive commercialisation of what began as an entirely non-commercial system. The Internet is allowing consumers and companies across the globe to communicate with each other, and if they can communicate, they can trade. The internet provides a number of technologies (like WAN’s, VAN’s, Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), email, shared databases and many other software packages) for enhancing e-businesses. The internet has become very popular and useful for electronic commerce because of its easier way of linking with other businesses at a much lower cost. The Internet and Electronic Commerce have made the world market a smaller place to trade in. The Internet has opened up many possibilities of organising and running an online business. It has created a universal platform for buying and selling of goods which has resulted in faster transaction times and reduced transaction costs.
The main three components of a market namely: sellers and buyers (or agents), products, and processes are digitised in e-commerce. E-commerce is not only an interactive version of retail business but it acts as a new medium of communication and provides more useful information, expands choices by simplifying purchasing processes and lowering costs [Shen et al, 2002]. Electronic commerce can play a key role in four ways: cost reduction; revenue expansion; time reduction; and relationship enhancement [Sawhney and Zabin, 2001]. It provides with new channels of interaction and communication between customers and sellers.

3.1.2 The growth of the Internet


The popularity of the Internet has grown remarkably in the last few years, and it has created a demand for ubiquitous networks. A report (Internet Connectivity, 2004) on the survey of Internet Service Providers (ISPs) shows that between August 2004 and August 2005 there was a 4.7 per cent increase in the number of active subscriptions to the Internet. The rapid diffusion of the Internet as a commercial medium has been widely documented (Jones and Biasiotto, 1999; Radosevich and Tweney, 1999). According to BMRB International (2004), In February 2004 the number of Internet users in GB has increased to 22.7 million (48.4% of the adult population).
 
Figure 1 Great Britain Households with home access to the Internet, July 2005
The market share for ‘permanent’ (now replaced by broadband) connections continued to increase in August and now accounts for 55 per cent of all internet connections. Dial-up Internet connections continued to decrease. According to BBC News (Wakefield, 2004) the number of broadband connections in the UK finally overtook dial-up and in December, 2004 and BT announced that it was making a new broadband connection every 10 seconds. According to figures gathered by industry watchdog, Ofcom, the growth means that the UK has now surpassed Germany in terms of broadband internet users per 100 people. The UK total of 5.3 million translates into 7.5 connections per 100 people, compared to 6.7 in Germany and 15.8 in the Netherlands (BBC, 2004).


3.1.3 Importance of commercial use of Internet


The internet has become a very popular platform for conducting businesses. Its ease of use, low cost, global connectivity and multimedia capabilities can be sued to create interactive applications, services and products. Some of its benefits are described below:
1. Connectivity and Globalisation
Internet provides its customers and suppliers a wide of market. It allows individuals to access companies or businesses which normally would be out of their reach. Small companies can also open up their foreign markets through Internet.
2. Reduced Communication costs
Before the Internet, the firms had to build their own network and direct mailing and faxing was used.  With the advent of the Internet, the communication and operational costs incurred in any business has drastically reduced. Hardware and software have been developed for Internet telephony which allows companies to use the Internet for telephone Voice transmission. Also VPNs (Virtual private Networks) are used as low cost alternatives to private WANs.
3. Lower Transaction Costs
Online transactions can be done at a very low cost as compared to traditional paper based transaction processes where the total cost (paper & human) of producing a purchase order (for example) can be 20 times higher than the electronic version of the same (Kenny and Curry, 2001).
4. Interactivity, Flexibility and Customisation
Internet provides interactive and flexible medium for the customers to interact with the business applications. Companies use email, chat rooms and bulletin boards to provide good customer service to the users and information can be gathered to provide customised information to the customers according to their needs.
5. Wide distribution of Knowledge
Internet provides rapid and vast access to knowledge. Organisations can use email and online databases to search for information resources. In addition to public knowledge on the Internet, organisations can also create their own websites as repositories of useful data and information which can be used by its employees easily and effectively.


3.1.4 On-line shopping


Electronic Commerce is classified roughly into two categories: Business-to-Business Electronic Commerce (B2B) and Business-to-Consumer Electronic Commerce (B2C). B2B is commerce where purchase and sale transactions occur not between individuals but between companies by using the Web and extranets. B2C is commerce where these transactions take place between the consumers and the sellers via the Internet [Lee et al, 2002a]. Individuals can purchase goods and services from retailers electronically through B2C commerce, who in turn can use B2B commerce to link directly to their suppliers. Electronic payment systems are used in both the B2C and B2B commerce. It uses technologies like electronics funds transfer, credit cards, smart cards, debit cards and internet based payment systems to pay for services and products online. Lack of consumer trust in e-commerce transactions and the social, financial and legal infrastructures of the e-commerce environment, poses a major challenge to the large-scale uptake of B2C e-commerce [Patton and Josang, 2004]. Online shopping is one of the main activities in B2C electronic commerce.
The Internet allows consumers to browse product/service extensively, collect data, locate information, download information, compare prices, buy products, place/change orders, and receive feedback without travelling to a shopping mall. Consumers can browse or shop online 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, from office or at home. Convenience has been reported as the primary reason for shoppers to shop on the Internet (Wolhandler, 1999). Additional factors such as saving money and time, no transportation cost, more choice, no waiting lines and no pressure from the sales people were also reported to contribute to a more enjoyable shopping experience on the Internet (Wolhandler, 1999; GVU’s WWW 9th User Surveys, 1998). According to Dawson et al. (1990, p. 409), ‘‘although there are many theories of shopping motivation, no one theory has become dominant in the retailing literature.’’ However, consumers’ shopping experiences have been examined within the context of three behaviours: browsing (Punj and Staelin, 1983), one-time purchase (Bulkeley and Carlton, 2000), or repeat purchases (Donthu and Garcia, 1999).

3.2 Internet Security


3.2.1 Internet Crime and cyber criminals


Internet offers criminals unparalleled opportunities. This is not surprising when one considers the anonymity it can provide, the speed with which it operates, the ease with which a cyber criminal can get on line, and the size of the market into which to tap (with online shopping profits alone expected to exceed $103 million by 2006). Internet crime can be defined broadly as any crime that employs a computer on the internet in any phase of the crime (Williams, 2001). Examples of internet crimes may include critical infrastructure attack, fraud, online money laundering, ID fraud, stealing sensitive information, hacking, etc. Targeted web attacks are not limited to networks of large organizations. Such attacks accounted for 10% of total attacks in small businesses in the first half of 2004 compared to 3% in the second half of 2003 (Symantec, 2004, p. 17).
Crimes related to online shopping websites mainly relate to credit card fraud for theft, stealing of personal information to blackmail or defame any particular individual or just for causing loss to the business organisation. The criminals take control of the user’s computer or the company web servers using malicious software. The organisations try their best to keep their servers as secure as possible but the criminals are relentless in continuously finding loopholes in the secured system. Internet crime according to latest reports rise by 30% every year (BBC News, 2005). For example number of hijacked/hacked computers  increased to 10,352 from 4,348 just in the first half of 2005!
A survey conducted among the members of the Confederation of British Industry indicated that the attackers in the most serious cyber crimes in 2000 were hackers (44.8%), former employees (13.4%), organized criminal groups (12.8%), current employees (11.5%), customers (7.9%), competitors (5.8%), political and protest groups (2.6%) and terrorists (1.4%) (BBC News 2001). The motivation of committing a cyber crime vary to a great degree ranging from fun, challenge, satisfaction, economic benefits to destructive nature (Lindenberg, 2001; Lakhani and Wolf, 2005). 


3.2.2 Security risks in e-commerce


A security threat has been defined as a “circumstance, condition, or event with the potential to cause economic hardship to data or network resources in the form of destruction, disclosure, modification of data, denial of service, and/or fraud, waste, and abuse” (Kalakota and Whinston, 1996). Security, then, is the protection against these threats. Under this definition, threats can be made either through network and data transaction attacks, or through unauthorized access by means of false or defective authentication.
Security commitments in B2C e-commerce are reflected in the actions of the Web merchant. Yet, for consumers, the primary, visible access to security on Web merchants’ sites is through statements that describe in more or less understandable terms the security policies of the Web merchant, from information collected to data sharing policies, and security features such as encryption and password protections. Groups like TRUSTe or BBBOnLine offer programs that businesses can participate in to show their commitment to security. Once joining the program, the business is allowed to post the third-party privacy and security ‘seal’ indicating their participation. Third party security seals are increasingly used by businesses to communicate their commitment to security. The effectiveness of communicating security commitments to consumers by the use of third party verification programs would be important for electronic businesses to know. In a 2001 study, Harris reported that when consumers notice security seals they consider them important, and are more willing to provide personal information to the site because of the third party verification (Harris, 2001). Another study reports that 60% of consumers indicated that security statements on Web sites made them feel more confident about online transactions (Pastore, 2001). In order to justify these concerns, it would be helpful to examine what the online payment structure consists of, to what extent credit card fraud takes place in e-commerce, and what security technology exists, to secure online payments from fraud.
Numerous examples of a hacker stealing hundreds of credit card numbers along with customer details from many e-commerce sites, indicates that security technology is still vulnerable (Harrison, 2000). According to a previous online article by Legard (1999), although only 2% of Visa International Inc's credit card business relates to Internet transactions, 50% of its disputes and frauds are conning from that area. Interestingly, according to the same article, “illegal” consumers are to blame, rather than online merchants, are responsible for most of those disputes. Business and organisations are continuously working to put in place appropriate measures to curb internet crimes. Security measures for the safety of online transactions between consumers and businesses such as Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Secure electronic transactions (SET) protocols are developed and improved.


3.2.3 Privacy concerns in e-commerce


According to (Culnan and Milberg, 1999) people are less likely to perceive information practices as a threat to their privacy when: i) personal information is collected in the context of an existing relationship, ii) the information collected is relevant to the transaction, iii) they believe that the information will be used to draw reliable inferences about them, and iv) they perceive that they can control future use of information. Moving to the e-commerce exchanges, those conditions are not met in satisfactory degree. Consumers have concerns on how organizations use their personal data, what is exposed from those data in public records, and fear of unauthorized access, either within or outside the commercial organizations (Culnan and Milberg, 1999). Lee et al (1998), describe those concerns in more detail as:
a)   Improper Access: To access consumer’s remote computer without previous permission, in order to monitor when, where from and for how long the user visits a Web site, as well as in what type of transactions he is involved to.
b)   Improper Analysis: To analyze consumers’ personal information, without prior permission, in order to draw conclusion on consumers’ shopping behaviour and preferences.
c)   Improper Transfer: To distribute, sell, or share customer information without notice or permission from the customer.
d)   Unwanted Solicitation: To transmit information to potential customers without their knowledge or permission.
e)   Improper Storage: To store personal information in a non-secure way, enabling non-authorized individual account holders to access and manipulate that information. Information is not kept confidential and data integrity is not attained.
Culnan and Milberg (1999:10) point “consumers will continue to disclose personal information, as long as perceived benefits exceed the risks”. However, media and government attention on the issue of online privacy is raising consumer’s perceived risk during online purchases, than reducing them. Culnan and Milberg (1999) are emphasizing the need of online merchants to include fair information practices, meaning that consumers should have the right to know why information is collected, how it is used, and how their data confidentiality and integrity is secured. Furthermore, it is also suggested that successful online marketing practices should involve a new approach, using personal data in an ethical manner.
Louis Harris & Associates, on behalf of IBM (1999), conducted an international survey of consumers’ online perceptions, with 3000 respondents from U.S., United Kingdom, and Germany. The survey results indicate that online consumers are more likely to be concerned with their privacy, than offline ones. Moreover, among the important findings of the survey are: a) 47% of the respondents, are interested on finding a privacy statement, b) 63% of the online users have refused to give information when their fear of loss of privacy was high, and c) 40% of the respondents have decided not to proceed to a purchase due to privacy concerns.


3.3 Risk Perception


3.3.1 Perceived Risk


Perceived Risk as an important feature of consumer perceptions, which involves the amount of risk that consumers perceive to be present in the product purchase has significant impact on purchasing decision (Foxall et al., 1998). The concept of perceived risk was first introduced by Bauer in 1960 as a combination of uncertainty with the possibility of serious of outcome, and later had been considered in numerous studies (Tan, 1999), many of which were related to other consumer behaviour concept, such as cognitive style (Cox, 1967) and trust, etc. However, most frequent definitions of perceived risk were formulated in respect to the elements of uncertainty and consequence (Cunningham, 1967). In this study, Cunningham elucidated that “uncertainty” related to the identification of buying goals or the process of matching goals with the purchase decision, i.e. uncertainty as to buying goals and which purchases in terms of such as product and model can best match the buying goals; while “consequences” related to functional, performance, or psychological goals and money, time, and effort invested to achieve those goals, or any other possible adverse consequences if the purchase is made. Accordingly, the perceived risk was defined as the consumer’s perception of the uncertainty and concomitant adverse consequences of buying a product or service (Dowling and Staelin, 1994). Based on the concept of risk deduction which assumes that consumers enter into decision making in the market as a means of reducing risk (Bauer, 1960), the consumer is believed to act to get just enough information to reduce the risk to an acceptable level before acting when faced with a market decision (Taylor, 1974).
There are six major types of perceived risk’ have been widely applied by previous consumer researchers: financial risk, performance risk, physical risk, social risk, psychological risk and time risk (Brooker, 1984, Jacoby and Kaplan, 1972, Peter and Tarpey, 1975, Garner, 1986, Mitchell, 1992 and Schiffman and Kanuk, 1994). Financial risk will be high where the loss of money is an important consideration (Horton, 1976). Performance risk occurs when the chosen product fails to perform as desired and doses not deliver the benefits premised (Kim and Lennon, 2000; Simpson and Lakner, 1993). Physical risk refers to the possible harm to the consumer’s health or safety due to the purchase (Roselius, 1971). Psychological risk describes the case if the product harms the consumer’s self-esteem or self perception (Jacoby and Kaplan, 1972). Consumers run social risk when a product choice is not approved of by other social member (Gemunden, 1985). Finally, time risk results when the passage of time reduces the ability of the product to satisfy wants, such as when a product rapidly becomes obsolete, viz the perception that time, convenience or effort maybe wasted when a product purchased is repaired or replaced (Bauer, 1967).
For all these perceived risks, they can present in various combination during each given purchase. However, specific risks may present higher level in certain products, especially for financial risk and social risk. According to Hawkins, Best and Coney (1989), it has been asserted in this research that products with high expense or technical complexity represent high levels of economic risk; while product related closely to the consumer’s public or social image present high level of social risk. In this case, PC and costume jewellery are typical products with high financial and social risk respectively.


3.3.2 Perceived risk in on-line purchasing


Internet shopping appeared as a new type of shopping method not many years ago, has been getting more attention along with the spread of Internet due to the unbeatable convenience it brought about to the consumers. Beside of the convenience, previous researches indicate other attractive factors. The transaction can be held in anyplace accessed to Internet. Furthermore, consumers can buy a wide choice of products across the geographic boundaries while saving time and absence of sales pressure (McQuitty and Peterson, 2000) without worrying about the transportation and parking. More importantly, concerning the study of online consumer behaviour, the Internet environment positively affects the consumers’ decision to shop. Based on the study of Alba et al. (1997), online shopper will gain benefits in terms of vast selection, screening, reliability, and product comparisons. Selection as stated before, people can buy nearly anything via the Internet. People can screen a large number or options because abundant listings of categories greatly facilitate the browsing. Additionally, consumers can judge the products relying on the ratings or reputations of e- retailers in the online interactive communication environment. Finally, consumers are allowed to compare numerous items under various categories and their prices in order to make the choices among the alternatives or substitutes (Rowley, 2000).
Although compared to traditional shopping channels, it is evident that online shopping is a rather innovative and convenient way, more and more recent researches have pointed out the existing problems to be settled in this constantly changing marketing channel, which make it too risky to purchase through Internet and rely on it. In this channel, individuals have to make decisions of purchasing products based on limited and static information displayed on the screen such as the picture and price, but hardly inspect and touch the physical goods, so that there is no guarantee of getting whir, they see on the computer screen (Jarvenpaa and Tractinsky, 1999). Moreover, the uncertainty regarding system security, reliability, standards, and security of private financial information, such as disclosing credit cards and personal information etc are all reasons probably increase a certain degree of perceived risk when shopping on the Internet.
Similar to the traditional shopping channel, at the cyber shopping environment, perceived risk is defined as the potential for loss in pursuing a desired outcome while engaged in online shopping. However, the social and physical risks in online commerce have less to do with consumer perceived risk (Ha, 2002). Depending on the previous findings, the key risks in the online context are identified to be financial, performance, and privacy risks (Strader and Shaw, 1999). Performance risk can related to the online seller’s post-sale service, good return guarantee for faulty items and product warranty, etc. Besides, the Internet, just like any type of non-store shopping, makes it difficult to examine physical goods; consumers must rely upon somewhat limited information and pictures shown on the computer screen (Jarvenpaa and Tractinsky, 1999). Hence, the performance risk in online shopping tends to increase due to the lack of accurate judge of the product quality compared to the traditional shopping environment (Vijayasarathy and Jones, 2000). As in the real store, this risk is also deemed by Kim and Lennon (2000) to be greatest when the product is technologically complex or the price is high. Additionally, the issue of financial security, invasion of privacy and hacker attacks has become the primary concern of online shopper in the worldwide (Strader and Shaw, 1999). Accordingly, privacy risk is described by Jarvenppa and Todd (1997) to be the degree to which consumers suffer a loss of privacy owing to personal information collected when shopping online. Actually in another way, it can be considered as one type of psychological risk. Previous research by Dholaka (2001) has theorized that psychological risk is the experience of anxiety or discomfort arising from anticipated post- behavioral affective reactions, or worry and regret of purchasing and using the product. Accordingly, lack of privacy protecting and private information exposure constantly remaining in the Internet shopping site arouse consumers’ fear of the purchase. Also, Kwon (1998) argued another risk factor at cyber-shopping malls is the delivery time gap, or named delivery interval, which is about the gap between the purchase and the delivery. In other words, consumer easily feel worried about the time gap between cost and consumption. The last, but not the least, time risk associated with the operation of online purchases in this study focuses on the perceived lost or cost of time for customers’ information search activities without excluding the traditional meaning.
In total, the Internet is still considered a risky shopping channel which means a considerable portion of consumers perceives that risks outweigh the advantages of online shopping in their purchase decisions so that not made an online buying. As what Darian (1987) stated, people tend to feel uneasy with “faceless” retailer, because they are much more familiar with offline shopping rather than the online shopping and fear about the potential deception.


3.4 Trust


3.4.1 Definition


The nature and development of trust, has draw the attention from different academic areas, mainly from psychology, sociology, marketing and business theory. From a psychological perspective, Lewis & Weigert (1985:971) characterized trust as the “undertaking of a risky course of action on the confident expectation that all persons involved in the action will act competently and dutifully”. Similarly, Robinson (1996:576) defined trust as:
“A person’s expectations, assumptions, or beliefs about the likelihood that another’s future actions will be beneficial, favourable, or at least not detrimental to one’s interests.”
Both definitions are based on the individual’s perception of risk towards a relationship where the outcomes of the relationship are more or less uncertain. Similarly, Bromiley and Cummings (1995) viewed trust as an expectation of the trusted individual to be honest and fulfil its promises. Furthermore, Pearce (1974), on developing a model of interpersonal trust, notes that trust is based on assumptions of other’s knowledge, competence and motivation. However, those three perspectives perceive trust as one individual’s action, rather as an element of a relationship. Hardin (1992), examining the nature of trust from a more sociological approach, emphasizes that trust depends on three different factor: a) properties of the individual who want to trust another individual (truster), b) attributes of the trustee and c) the context in which trust is established.
Moving to the business literature, the concept of trust is again largely based on a “relationship” approach, and evolves overtime. Swan et al (1985), examining how industrial salespeople gain customer’s trust, mention that trust has a dynamic nature as it builds over the history of interactions between the trade partners. While Doney and Cannon (1997), suggest that trust is developed under certain processes. According to their research, those are:
a)  Calculative process, when one party calculates the costs of failure during the exchange.
b)   Prediction process, when one party acquires information to predict about the credibility of the other party.
c)   Capability process, based on the perception that one party has that the other has the capabilities to perform as promised.
d)   Intentionally process, based on the perception that one party has about the intention of the other.
e)  Transference process, based on gaining trust from third parties when little or no prior experience exists between the exchange parties.


3.4.2 Trust in Internet purchasing


As mentioned in the previous sections, it is reasonable for consumers to engage in trust relationships, when they feel a level of uncertainty with the outcomes of an exchange, or with the circumstances under which the exchange takes place. During online purchases, that uncertainty refers to the use of the Internet, as a commercial medium, or to online vendor’s reliability. Considering the fact that the increase of trust reduces the perceived risks during an online purchase, and that those risks has proven to be negative towards a purchase decision, we can conclude that trust is a crucial factor for the success of e-commerce or internet shopping. (Jarvenpaa & Tractinsky, 1999).
Lack of trust towards the Internet as a commercial medium can be translated to security concerns (i.e. credit-card fraud by ‘hackers’ etc) or concerns about the lack of a predictable legal framework on which online purchases take place (i.e. which government laws apply in every situation) (Ratnasigham,1998). In addition, lack of social interactions between consumers and vendors and the fact that, as with other distance purchases, consumers have to pay in advance in order to receive goods or services, increase the risks, therefore increase consumers concerns. According to Culnan and Armstrong (1997), another difficulty faced on e-commerce purchases is that trust has to be communicated solely through interaction with a web site.
Lack of trust towards e-commerce vendors has its grounds to security concerns (i.e. fraud by illegal or “fake” merchants), privacy concerns (i.e. for using the personal information for commercial purposes), or performance concerns, (i.e. receiving low quality products or services).Hoffman et al. (1999) emphasize that the reason many consumers do not proceed to online purchases is that they simply do not trust most of the Web merchants to give their credit card information or personal information. They explain the nature of the risk involved on an online transaction, as lack of environmental control and lack of control over information. Lack of environmental control exists while consumers have less control of Web merchants’ actions over their credit card information. Lack of control over personal information is very important specifically the concern that Web merchants use their personal information for marketing purposes, without their knowledge or permission. The significance of trust can be justified by Keen (2000), who interviewed consumers on the advantages and disadvantages of the e-commerce, trying to identify what factors can add more value to the customers. Examining the results, we can identify that most of the factors are related to the concept of online trust: minimise fraud, assure security, minimise misuse of personal information, assure reliable delivery, assure easy return process etc. Therefore, we can state that the e-commerce will offer more value to the consumer, by the time it will improve in terms of security, privacy, and performance, or in other words, by the time it becomes more trustworthy.


3.5 Research Hypothesis


H1: “Consumers will rank security and privacy features as the most important factors when considering acquisitions of goods or services over the Internet.”
H2: “Financial, privacy and performance risks are the three most important perceived risks according to the consumers”
This hypothesis is based on variety of factors related to perceived risk in online environment and trust as recognized from the literature review. The hypothesis supports that the perceived risks of security and privacy are indeed very real from the consumer’s point of view.


4. Research Methodology


4.1 Introduction


An appropriate research methodology is a general plan of how the researcher will go about answering the research questions considering the sources to collect data and the constraints that one might have (access to data, time, location and money, etc). It should reflect the fact that the researcher has thought carefully about why a particular strategy has been employed. This chapter will elaborate the considered and selected research paradigm, approach and tools for testing the research hypotheses.


4.2 Research Paradigm


4.2.1 Positivist Philosophy


Although positivism has been a recurrent theme in the history of western thought from the Ancient Greeks to the present day, it is historically associated with the nineteenth-century French philosopher, Auguste Comte, who was the first thinker to use the word for a philosophical position (Beck, 1979). Here explanation proceeds by way of scientific description (Acton, 1975). In his study of the history of the philosophy and methodology of science, Oldroyd (1986) says: It was Comte who consciously 'invented' the new science of society and gave it the name to which we are accustomed. He thought that it would be possible to establish it on a 'positive' basis, just like the other sciences, which served as necessary preliminaries to it. For social phenomena were to be viewed in the light of physiological (or biological) laws and theories and investigated empirically, just like physical phenomena. Likewise, biological phenomena were to be viewed in the light of chemical laws and theories; and so on down the line (Oldroyd, 1986).
The central belief of the logical positivists is that the meaning of a statement is, or is given by, the method of its verification. It follows from this that unverifiable statements are held to be meaningless, the utterances of traditional metaphysics and theology being included in this class. However the term positivism is used by philosophers and social scientists, a residual meaning is always present and this derives from an acceptance of natural science as the paradigm of human knowledge (Duncan, 1968). This includes the following connected suppositions which have been identified by Giddens (1975). First, the methodological procedures of natural science may be directly applied to the social sciences. Positivism here implies a particular stance concerning the social scientist as an observer of social reality. Second, the end-product of investigations by social scientists can be formulated in terms parallel to those of natural science.
Positivism is based on a fundamental belief that the world is made up of discoverable regularities that allow general explanations of behaviour to be developed. Followers of positivism attempt to answer questions about the current state of the topic of study.


4.2.2 Phenomenological Philosophy


In its broadest meaning, phenomenology is a theoretical point of view that advocates the study of direct experience taken at face value; and one which sees behaviour as determined by the phenomena of experience rather than by external, objective and physically described reality (English and English, 1958). Although phenomenologists differ among themselves on particular issues, there is fairly general agreement on the following points identified by Curtis (1978) which can be taken as distinguishing features of their philosophical viewpoint:
• a belief in the importance, and in a sense the primacy, of subjective consciousness;
• an understanding of consciousness as active, as meaning bestowing; and
• a claim that there are certain essential structures to consciousness of which we gain direct knowledge by a certain kind of reflection. Exactly what these structures are a point about which phenomenologist have differed.
Husserl, regarded by many as the founder of phenomenology, was concerned with investigating the source of the foundation of science and with questioning the commonsense, 'taken-for-granted' assumptions of everyday life (see Burrell and Morgan, 1979). To do this, he set about opening up a new direction in the analysis of consciousness. His catch-phrase was 'back to the things!' which for him meant finding out how things appear directly to us rather than through the media of cultural and symbolic structures. In other words, we are asked to look beyond the details of everyday life to the essences underlying them.
Schutz was concerned with relating Husserl's ideas to the issues of sociology and to the scientific study of social behaviour. Of central concern to him was the problem of understanding the meaning structure of the world of everyday life. The origins of meaning he thus sought in the 'stream of consciousness' — basically an unbroken stream of lived experiences which have no meaning in themselves. One can only impute meaning to them retrospectively, by the process of turning back on oneself and looking at what has been going on. In other words, meaning can be accounted for in this way by the concept of reflexivity (Burrell and Morgan, 1979).


4.2.3 Adopted Philosophy


The research methodology used in this study draws heavily upon the theory of positivism. Positivism has been chosen because the aims and objectives of this study suit the methodology. The objective is to identify the perceived risks of internet shopping by the consumers and how real they actually are? This is in line of positivists thinking wherein they identify the current situation and try to identify the key influencing factors that could further influence it.

4.3 Research Approach


4.3.1 Inductive Approach


An inductive research approach is used when the research tries to gain an understanding of the meanings human attach to the events under consideration. A close understanding of the research context is essential and the research may be carried out without a detailed literature review. Qualitative data is generally collected in an inductive approach. Inductive research is more time consuming however it offers more flexibility to the overall research design. Inductive approach tends to formulate theory from data.


4.3.2 Deductive Approach


Deductive research is based on scientific principals and tends to move from theory to data. It is a more structured approach and quantitative data is generally collected in a deductive research. The idea is to review the literature in detail, form a hypothesis and test it using primary data. There is a necessity to select a large sample size in order to generalize the conclusions drawn from a deductive research. Deductive research is quicker to complete.


4.3.3 Adopted Approach


The selected approach for this research is deductive in nature. According to Chappell (2002), a deductive approach to research is one, where the aim is to establish facts and test hypotheses. This is what we are trying to do. We have established research hypothesis based on the literature review and will test it using primary research using questionnaires. 


4.4 Research Strategy


4.4.1 Questionnaire


The foremost aim of positivist research is to “discover natural laws so people can predict and control events” (Neuman, 2003, pg 91). It is based on the premise of repeatability and hence they prefer to collect quantitative data. Neuman (2003) identifies four types of quantitative data collection techniques. These are experiments, surveys, content analysis, and existing statistics. The author decided to use the survey method for the purpose of this research. Surveys are commonly used in both descriptive and explanatory research, as many people can be asked many questions in a short time period. In survey research many people are asked questions and the answers are recorded and then analysed. Surveys (either by questionnaires, telephone or face-to-face interviews) are the most popular data collection instrument in business studies. Much existing literature has noted that electronic surveys are attractive to researchers, both academically and commercially because of the potential that they have to reduce the expense of survey work. Bachmann et al. (1996) and Weible and Wallace (1998) both note that electronic surveys offer considerable cost advantages over traditional mail surveys. Due to the limited resources of the researcher in terms of time and costs, it was decided to conduct an electronic survey using questionnaires.
Questionnaires provide the easiest known way of assembling a mass of information (Burroughs, 1971: pg 106). But a lot of care has to be taken in order to construct questionnaires to maximise response rate. Hence, the researcher may have prepared to collect a vast amount of information from a huge sample, due to long length or some kind of complexity in the questionnaire; it may yield a response rate so low that the data may not be adequate to make any kind of generalisation or even a reliable statement.
Advantages of using questionnaires
• Each person answering a particular questionnaire reads an identical set of questions which allows for consistency and makes processing answers easier (Denscombe, 1998).
• They are economical, the costs faced were nearly negligible, since once the form was loaded on the server, and all entries came in the form of e-mail.
• Easier to send and receive response and they supply standardised answers form all recipients
Disadvantages
• Since most questions are pre coded respondents true feelings and views do not come up
• Filling the questionnaire is on optional basis by the respondent, care has to be taken to ask precise questions and keep the length to a tolerable level.
• The validity and truthfulness of the information provided by the respondent in the questionnaire is always a concern while analysing the data
Keeping this in mind, for the purpose of this research, due care was taken to avoid hypothetical questions, double questions, presuming questions and any form of ambiguity or imprecision in questions. Also, an attempt has been made to keep the length of the questionnaire very precise, with to the point questions consisting mainly of multiple-choice questions enabling the reader to be comfortable to fill the questionnaire without much loss of time, thereby increasing the questionnaires response rate as well as making data analysis simple.
Please view appendix I for the complete questionnaire. 


4.4.2 Sampling


In order to collect appropriate information on the views of the users in Internet, a very large portion of the world's population would be an eligible target, but due to various practical problems of time and cost involved in such a process, a sample of the population was considered for this research. The sample population involved in this project was carried out on a small scale due to the time and resources available. Even though on a small scale the responses should be adequate enable a pattern of overall stability on the basis of which reliable statements could be made. The survey polled a population of Internet users working in companies as well as students situated in the north-east region of England in order to get their perspective of the security issues of e-commerce.


5. Results and Analysis


The questionnaire was attached to the electronic emails and sent to the convenience of 100 individuals known to the researcher in the U.K. In each email the purpose and how to answer the questionnaire were described, and they were also asked to distribute the questionnaire to their friends and family. One follow-up email reminder was sent to non-responsive individuals after five days. 56 responses were received.
The sample for the study consisted of students, professionals and few retired people. Around 60% of the sample was men and most of them were below 30 years. The questionnaire was sent to the sample through email and the responses were collected and analysed through the survey software Peruses. The questionnaire was divided into different sections focusing on Internet self efficacy and usage, Perceived Web security and privacy and About Yourself.  The Results indicate several trends in overall components perceived as risks to the online shoppers. The overall research questions have been used to organize the presentation of the data.
5.1 Internet self efficacy and Usage (Computer Training/ Access to Email/ Experience/ Confidence)
This section covered questions on the availability and accessibility to Internet as well as the confidence in using the Internet.
1. Have you ever had any computer training for the Internet?
2. How many years have you been using Email or World Wide Web?
3. How confident do you feel using the Internet?
There has been significant development in terms of the Internet user population and Internet usage since the last 10 years. Around 40% of the sample had computer training for the Internet. More than 60 % of the sample has been using Internet for the past 3-4 years (as shown in Figure 2 - How confident do you feel using the Internet?). And almost 70% of the sample was confident in using the Internet.
 
Figure 2 - How confident do you feel using the Internet?
4. How often do you use the following on the Internet?
In order to investigate the respondent’s current online activities and the degree to which online shopping is used, they were asked to state their primary purpose of using the Internet. This question had multiple responses. The options given for this question were: Research a topic, Reading articles/newspapers, looking for jobs, Online Shopping, Obtaining information about products, Planning Travel and finding about careers. Results of the study indicate that the majority of the participants used Internet for planning travel which was closely followed by Gathering information on Jobs/Careers. Around 22% (12/56) of the sample said that they never use the Internet for shopping, while 60% of them used Internet for shopping and the rest 20 % were not very keen for Internet shopping.


Figure 3 - How often do you use the following on the internet?
5. In the past 6 months, have you ever purchased products or services through the Internet?
More than 60% of the participants had not purchased products or services through the Internet in the past six months (shown in Figure 4 – Internet Purchase in last 6 months? Lee et al. (2000) concluded that consumers who buy online are better educated than those Internet users who do not, and income is higher for web buyers than non-web buyers.
 
Figure 4 – Internet Purchase in last 6 months?
5.2 Perceived Web security and privacy
6. Do you feel secure sending personal/financial info across the Web?
A majority (88%) of the participants agreed that they feel insecure sending personal/financial information on the web. So retailers need to simplify the transaction process and enhance payment security on behalf of their consumers.
 
Figure 5 Do you feel secure sending personal/financial info across the Web?
7. When visiting an online shopping website, which of the following features do you look for?
When visiting an online shopping website, out of the many features available (Company Profile, Contact Address through email, Security Certificate, 24 Hour Customer Service, Free shipping and Handling, Protection of personal information, Policy Notes, Hyperlinks to other related information), the most popular and useful one valued by the participants was the Security Certificate (51/56). Protection of personal information was the second most valued (41/56) feature for the respondents.
Detailed product Information, free shipping and handling, 24 hours Customer Service and guaranteed delivery within a specified time frame were the next most valued features of an online shopping website. Policy notes and large selection of merchandise were the features which did not seem important to the participants. An appealing website design and functionality (17/56) also appeared to be not very important.

Topic Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Company Profile and overall Brand equity.
 7 26 18 5 0
Security Certificate.
 35 16 4 1 0
24 Hour Customer Service.
  17 17 15 7 0
Large selection of merchandise.
 3 9 21 21 2
Detailed product Information.
 9 27 20 0 0
Policy Notes.
 0 3 28 17 8
Free shipping and Handling.
 19 13 23 0 0
How clearly the Return Policy is explained.
 21 18 15 2 0
Delivery within a specified time frame (Guaranteed delivery).
 23 17 12 2 0
Simplicity of process. (How simple it is to buy something online.)
 7 19 13 15 2
Tracking (Does the site provide any feedback or a confirmation number once the order is placed.)
 7 30 16 3 0
Protection of personal information.
 26 15 7 7 2
Speed (How quickly each page, text and images appear.)
 3 26 12 11 4
Functionality (Overall, how well the site seems to work.)
 5 12 28 6 5

Table 1 - When visiting an online shopping website, which features do you value?
 
Figure 6 Online shop most valued features
It was noticeable that a store’s reputation/company profile was listed as an important factor of choosing a particular website. The risk associated with online shopping and transaction is still perceived to be very high. In addition to product attributes such as quality and price, online consumers also take other factors into account in order to decrease the risk involved when making a buying decision. For Internet users, an online retailer’s reputation is of importance. Trust is associated with a lower perceived risk of online shopping, and a consumers’ perception of the Internet retailer’s reputation and size is expected to affect their trust of the retailer (Jarvenpaa et al., 2000). Thus, online retailers should do what they can to impress the prospects of these two aspects with relevant marketing communications efforts.
8. Please select the given below traditional brands/symbols that would increase your trust if you saw them on a website.
 
Figure 7 - Traditional brands/symbols that would increase trust on a website.
As can be seen from the figure above, the symbol of VeriSign scored the highest (43/56) on increasing trust on a website with that symbol followed by Visa and MasterCard. This essentially implies that the perceived risk from a consumer’s point of view for the online shops is relatively low if one of the above mentioned sign is displayed appropriately. 
9. Do you intend to purchase products from the internet in the near future?

 

Figure 8 - Do you intend to purchase products from the internet in the near future?
The above graph is self-explanatory which shows that 53 % of the participants intend to purchase products from the internet in the near future while the rest 47% were not interested in buying anything form the Internet in the near future.
5.3 About Respondents
This section covered questions to gather information on the number of males and females in the survey including their age and occupation.
10. What is your gender?
11. How old are you?
12. Are you?
These questions were important to see if the gender, age and occupation affect the choice of shopping or not. The sample consisted of 39 males and 17 females. Most of the participants (34/56) were below 30 years of age. Forty of the participants were students (as the questionnaire was distributed through email to students and they were free to circulate it to their family and friends), twelve were in full time employment, 3 were part-time employed and 1 was unemployed.


Figure 9- What is your gender?
 
Figure 10 - How old are you?


Figure 11 - Occupation

5.4 Questionnaire summary
Security of sensitive information/Security certificate (91%) was the most important factor during the actual transaction stage. Protection of personal information was also considered to be the second most important factor. Szymanski and Hise (2000) say in one of their papers that the online transaction security dominates the discussions on Internet commerce. Also credit-card security is emphasized as a major consideration by 75 percent of Internet shoppers when deciding whether or not to purchase online. Ranganathan and Ganapathy (2002) also find that security and privacy have greater impact on the online purchase intention of consumers than information content and design of a retailing website.
The overwhelming factor that influenced or prevented them purchasing online was the threat of breach of security. Results revealed that security concerns were the major factor, regardless of the respondent category, purchasing experience, etc, that portrayed negative attitudes against online purchasing. As a result, the internet as a shopping medium is facing difficulties in expanding mainly due to the reliability concern attached to it, in terms of security, privacy, etc. Security is still a major concern for internet users that have already made an online purchase, as they may be more aware of the risks involved than offline consumers. Therefore, online retailers must make necessary and adequate protection mechanisms to ensure their customers the security of transaction and sensitive information.


6. Conclusion and Further Work


Internet serves as an electronic chain of communication linking the consumer (client) to the electronic commerce resource (commerce server). But Internet as a medium of communication in itself is not very secure. CTR (2001)  in its article on E-Commerce security, states that the E-Commerce market is inherently an open market, difficult to inherit any kind of security in totality. Quoting the words of CTR (2001) on E-Commerce,
"On the Internet - a network that was designed for openness, not security. E-commerce, an application that demands high security, is occurring on a network with no inherent security ".
The potential of E-Commerce as a business model are enormous and expanding in the horizontal as well as the vertical markets, linking business suppliers and buyers through Intranet and Extranet as well as providing consumers with all time marketing facility accessible from anywhere in the world. The main point that emerged from through the brief analysis of the advantages as well as the disadvantages of using e-commerce, was that though the e-commerce technology might seem like a paragon to the business world, just like any economic market, it is governed by the science of human behaviour, which is very unpredictable. The adversaries of the web world account for a major part of economic problems of the web market. Malpractices may be in the form of some security threats which have the potential to cause danger to data or network resources via destruction, modification or denial of data. A fraudulent seller may rip innocent customers off their money whilst not delivering goods or delivering faulty -goods, a hacker may through various plots of fraud hack sites, and databases to gain vital and confidential information of an organisation. By attacking an organisations web site a hacker may Vandalise or deface the site to display a politically motivated message, merely prove a point or just to have fun. But the consequences that a firm may face due to such an act, could lead to loss of trust and confidence of the customer in the company, which once lost takes years to rectify.
The research results show that lack of trust, towards internet as a commercial medium as well as an online transaction medium, is the first reason why many consumers still fear to make online purchases. The results from previous Internet surveys quote other factor as the first barriers for online shopping, such as security of transactions and lack of privacy over personal information, still those factors are closely connected with trust online. Even, in the case of online consumers, who somewhat have adopted e-commerce as familiar way of purchasing, trust is proven to be a necessary element. The analysis of the questionnaire data reveals that concerns over the security of online transactions is the first factor to reduce the levels of trust towards online commercial environments. That result is in agreement with previous surveys results from Ernst and Young (1999). Consumers, who have not made any online purchases, fear for security breaches from illegal individuals, as they fear for security breaches from online merchants may dispute their credit card information, either as a part of their overall intentions, or from individuals inside their organizations. Consistent with Swaminathan et al (1999) research, those security concerns are somewhat negatively connected with the likelihood of purchase online, as consumers more unlikely to purchase online, are the ones who concern the most.
On the other hand, online consumers concern mostly about their credit card data been abused by illegal individuals, than illegal merchants. Due to the experience of purchasing interactions, their uncertainty towards online store reliability tends to decrease, in terms of security, but still remains high towards the reliability of the Internet environment as a commercial medium. The research finding that personal experience is the most influential factor, in regard to perception of security, justifies the existence of the difference between the two categories of consumers. Online consumer's perception of security is based on the their prior history of online purchases, while with non-online consumers, that perception, thus their level of uncertainty, is based on their personal experience as users of the chaotic web environment. Furthermore, media attention and friends have proven to be weaker factors of influence on perception over the security of online transactions. Finally, the survey reveals that consumers, with better levels of education and computer experience, tend to grow more fears over the security in e-commerce. We can assume that those results derive from the fact that those categories of consumers are more likely to interpret negative information about online security, corning from the external sources of information (i.e. media).
Thus the results of the survey uphold the hypotheses H1 as well as H2 formulated based on the literature review and suggest that security and privacy concerns while shopping online are indeed very real from the consumer’s point of view. This was very evident from the survey results in which the consumers ranked security (financial), personal information (privacy) and Delivery within a specified time frame (performance) as the most valued factors they consider while shopping online. To reduce vendor-related perceived risk, businesses could consider providing more company information, such as names of owners, staff, company history, physical addresses, and privacy policies on their Web-sites. Businesses should also enhance their customer services and avoid asking for unnecessary data. In terms of consumers’ perceived product risk, businesses could consider offering incentives such as warranty or money back guarantee. In summary, businesses should communicate with consumers; deliver technology guarantee and product quality guarantee, to inspire confidence.
There could be some element of geographical bias as the sample was primarily from the north east region of UK. It could be possible that consumers perceive different risks or threats because of where they are located. The location may prove to play an important role as a council from a different region may take additional steps to educate the community regarding various threats and make them more confident while shopping online. Also there may be some element of non-response bias. The sample that did not respond may all have dissimilar characteristics, which could result in misleading results. However, the possibility of this is remote. Considering these limitations, there are opportunities for a much larger study to be carried out on similar lines. The variables of the study may also be operationalised to a greater extent in future work to form stronger links among variables. Further study may also include a detailed qualitative survey on the factors that would make the consumer to shop online more often.


 
References and Bibliography

Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz, R, Sawyer, Alan., & Wood, S. (1997). Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces, Journal of Marketing, 61 (July), 38-53.
Bachmann, D.  Elfrink J.  and B. Vazzana , (1996) Tracking the progress of e-mail versus snail mail. Marketing Research 8 2, pp. 31–35.
Bauer, R.A. (1960) Consumer behaviour as risk taking In: D.F. Cox, Editor, Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behaviour, Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA (1960), pp. 23–33.
BBC News, 2004. Broadband in the UK growing fast. [Accessed on 16/11/2005]
BHATNAGAR, A., MISRA, S., AND RAO, H.V. 2000. On Risk, Convenience, and InternetShopping Behavior. Communications of the ACM 43(11), 98-105.
Black, G.S. (2005) Is eBay for Everyone? An Assessment of Consumer Demographics, SAM Advanced Management Journal, Winter, Vol. 70 Issue 1.
Blythe, J. (1997) The essence of Consumer Behaviour, Prentice Hall, UK
Bromiley, P. & Cummings, L. L. 1995, in press. Organizations with trust. R.Bies, R. Lemicki & B. Sheppard (Eds.), Research in Negotiations. 5th edition,Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.
Brooker, G. (1984)  An assessment of an expanded measure of perceived risk. Assoc Consum Res 11 (1984), pp. 439–446.
Bulkeley W, Carlton J. E-tail gets derailed: how web upstarts misjudged the game. Wall St J 2000;CV(68):A1 (April 5).
Cox, D. F. (1967). Risk handling in consumer behavior-an intensive study of two cases. In Cox, D. F. (Ed), Risk taking and information handling In consumer behavior (pp. 34-81). Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston.
Culnan, M.J. and Armstrong, P.K. "Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation," Organization Science (10:1), 1999, pp. 104-115.
Culnan, Mary J. and Sandra J. Milberg (1999), "Consumer Privacy", in: Information Privacy:Looking Forward, Looking Back, ed. Mary Culnan, R. Bies and M. Levy, Georgetown University Press.
Cunningham, Scott M. (1967), "Major Dimensions of Perceived Risk," in Donald F. Cox (ed.), Risk-taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Boston, MA: Harvard University, 82-108.
DARIAN, J.C. 1987. In-Home Shopping: Are There Consumer Segments? Journal of Retailing 63(2), 163-186.
Dawson S, Blouch PH, Ridgway NM. Shopping motives, emotional states, and retail outcomes. J Retail 1990;66(4):408 –27 (Winter).
Doney, P. and J. Cannon (1997). “An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships.” Journal of Marketing 61: 35-51.
Donthu N, Garcia A. The internet shopper. J Advertising Res 1999; 39(3):52–8 (May–June).
Dowling, G. R., & Staelin, R. (1994). A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (June), 119-134.
Ernest and Young, (2000) Dot-Coms and value of assurance, A report by Ernest and Young
Foxall, G., Goldsmith, R., & Stephen, B. (1998). Consumer psychology for marketing. International Thompson Business Press, London.
Fuatai, P. and Janet, T. (2004). Electronic Commerce for the South Pacific: A Review of E-Readiness. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. Electronic Commerce Research, 4: 241–262 (2004)
Garner,S. J. (1986) Perceived risk and information sources in services purchasing. Mid-Atl J Bus 24 (1986), pp. 49–58 Summer .
Gemunden, H. G. (1985). Perceived risk and information search: A systematic meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. International Journal of Research in Marketig, 2, 79-100.
Gemünden,H.G.(1985) Perceived risk and information search. A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Int. J. Res. Market. 2 (1985), pp. 79–100.
GVU’s 9th WWW User Surveys. April–May 1998.
Ha, H-Y. (2001). The effects of user’s flow commitment on the Internet: A conceptual buying intention model. Unpublished Working Paper, UMIST, UK.
Ha, H-Y. (2002). The relationships between 3-D advertisings and risk perceptions on the Web: The mediating role of brand and emotion. Unpublished Working Paper, UMIST, UK
Hardin, R. (1992), ‘The Street-Level Epistemology of Trust,’ Analyse & Kritik, 14, 152-176.
Hawkins, D. I., Best, R. J., & Coney, K. A. (1989). Consumer behavior: Implications for marketing strategy (4th ed.). Boston: Irwin.
Hoffmam, D. L. TP Novak and M Peralta, (1999) Building consumer trust. Commun ACM 42 4, pp. 80–85.
Horton,R. L. (1976) The structure of decision risk: some further progress. J Acad Mark Sci 4 (1976), pp. 94–706.
Internet connectivity, August 2005, Issued by National Statistics, London SW1V 2QQ. [Accessed on 16/11/2005]
Jacoby, J and Kaplan, L (1972)  The components of perceived risk. In: M Venkatesan, Editor, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Convention of the Association for Consumer Research, (1972), pp. 382–393.
Jarvenpaa, S.L., Tractinsky, N. and Vitale, M. (2000), Consumer trust in an Internet store, Information Technology and Management, Vol.1, pp.45-71.
Jarvenpaa,S.L. and Todd,P.A. (1996) Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web. Int. J. Electronic Commerce 1 2 (1996), pp. 59–88.
Joines, J. L., & Scherer, C.W. et al. (2003). "Exploring motivations for consumer Web use and their implications for e-commerce." Journal of Consumer Marketing 20(2), 90-108
Jones K, Biasiotto M. Internet retailing: current type or future reality? Int Rev Retail, Distrib Cons Res 1999;9(1):69–79 (January).
Kalakota, R. & Robinson, M. (2001). E-Business 2.0: Roadmap for Success. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Kalakota, R., Whinston, A.B., 1996. Frontiers of Electronic Commerce, Addison-Wesley, Reading,
Keen, P.G.W. "Ensuring E-trust," Computerworld, (34:11), March 13 2000, pp. 46.
Kenney, M. & Curry, J. (2001). “Beyond Transaction Costs: E-commerce and the Power of the Internet Dataspace”. In Leinbach, T.R. & Brunn, S.D. (eds). Worlds of e-commerce: Economic, Geographical and Social Dimensions. Chichester: John Wiley. p.45-65
Kim, M, & Lennon, SJ. 2000. Television shopping for apparel in the ... Stanforth, NF, Lennon, SJ, & Moore, S. 2000. Perceived risk and purchase intentions. Family and Consumer Science Research Journal 28:301-30.
Lakhani, K.R. and Wolf,R.G. (2005) In: J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam and K.R. Lakhani, Editors, Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (2005), MIT Press (2005)
Lee, H., Cho, D. and Lee, S. (2002a). Impact of e-Business initiatives on firm value. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 1 (2002) 41–56
Lee, H., Lee, S. and Pak, P. (2002b). Business value of B2B electronic commerce: the critical role of inter-firm collaboration. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2 (2003) 350–361
Lee, K., Chung, N. Effect of virtual reality-driven shopping mall and consumer’s purchase intention, Korean Management Review 29 (3) (2000) 377–405.
Lewis, J. David, & Weigert, Andrew. 1985. Trust as a Social Reality. Social Forces,63(4), 967--985.
Lindenberg, S. 2001 Intrinsic motivation in a new light, Kyklos 54 (2001) (2/3), pp. 317–342
Louis Harris & Associates, on behalf of IBM (1999) E-commerce and privacy: What net users want.
McQuitty, S and Peterson, R. T. (2000), Selling home entertainment on the Internet: An overview of a dynamic marketplace, Journal of Consumer Marketing, v17, pp233-248.
Mehta, R and Sivadas, E (1995) Direct marketing in the Internet: an empirical assessment of consumer attitudes. J Direct Mark 9 3 (1995), pp. 21–32.
Mitchell,V-W (1992) Understanding consumers' behavior: can perceived risk theory help?. Manage Decis 30 (1992), pp. 26–31.
Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches
Patton, M. and Josang, A. (2004). Technologies for Trust in Electronic Commerce, Electronic Commerce Research, 4: 9–21 (2004)
Pearce, W.B. (1974) Trust in interpersonal communication. Speech Monographs, 41(3): 236-244.
Peter,JP and Tarpey,  L. (1975) A comparative analysis of three consumers decision strategies. J Consum Res 2 (1975), pp. 29–37.
Punj GN, Staelin R. A model of consumer information search for new automobiles. J Consum Res 1983;9:366–80 (March).
Radosevich L, Tweney D. Retooling retail: consumer sales in the internet may force the industry to reinvent itself. InfoWorld 1999;21(12):1 (March 22).
Ranganathan, C. and Ganapathy, S. (2002), Key dimensions of business-to-consumer web sites, Information and Management, 39, pp.457-465.
Ratnasingham,P. (1998) The importance of trust in electronic commerce, Internet Research 8(4) (1998) 313-321.
Robinson (1996), “Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract,” Administrative Science Quarterly,41, 574-599.
Roselius, E. (1971) Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. J Mark 35 (1971), pp. 56–61 January .
Rosenbloom, B. (2002) The ten deadly myths of e-commerce. Business Horizons, 2002, vol. 45, issue 2, pages 61-66

Rowley, J. (2000). Product search in e-shopping: A review and research propositions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17 (1), 20-35.
Schiffman LG and Kanuk, L.L. (1994) Consumer behavior, Prentice-Hall (1994).
Shen, X., Radakrishnan, T. and Georganas, N. (2002). v COM: Electronic commerce in a collaborative virtual world. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 1 (2002) 281–300
Strader, TJ & Shaw, MJ (1999), ‘Consumer Cost Differences for Traditional and Internet Markets’.Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, vol. 9, issue, pp. 82-92.
Swaminathan, V, Lepkowska-White, E & Rao, BP (1999), ‘Browsers or Buyers in Cyberspace? An Investigation of Factors Influencing Electronic Exchange’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 5, no. 2 (December).
Swan,J.E,Trawick, F.I.  and D.W. Silva,(1985) How industrial salespeople gain customer trust, Industrial Marketing Management 14 (1985) 203-211.
Symantec., 2004. Symantec Internet Security Threat Report, vol. VI.
Szymanski, D.M. and Hise, R.T (2000), E-satisfaction: An initial examination, Journal of Retailing, Vol.76, No.3, pp.309-322.
Tan, S. J. (1999). Strategies for reducing consumers’ risk aversion in Internet shopping. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16 (2),163-180.
Vijayasarathy, L.R. and J.M. Jones, 2000. "Print and Internet Catalog Shopping: Assessing Attitudes and Intentions," Internet Research, volume 10, number 3, pp. 191-202
Wakefield, J. 2004. Broadband soars in 2004. [Accessed on: 15/11/2005]
Weible R. and Wallace J., (1998) Cyber research: the impact of the Internet on data collection. Marketing Research 10 3, pp. 19–31.
Williams, P., 2001. Organized crime and cybercrime: synergies, trends, and responses, 13 August, Office of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State,http://usinfo.state.gov
Wolhandler HC. Real numbers behind Net Profits 1999. ActivMedia Res.(6th annual survey of online commerce (May 1999).
Zwass, V. (1998). Foundations of Information Systems, New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

   

 

Bookmark this website

Quick Question

What are you studying?
 

Free Essays

Free Business Essays
 
 
Please note: The above essays and dissertations were written by students and then submitted to us to display and help others. Thanks to all the students who have submitted their work to us.