Advantages and disadvantages of scotland having their own parliment |
|
It is common historical knowledge that Scotland became part of the United Kingdom in 1707 following the ratification of the Act of Union. Nearly 300 years later, the Pledge of the Scottish Claim of Right was signed in Edinburgh on March 30th 1989 by 133 members of the Scottish Constitutional Convention requesting that decisions on the form of government which best suits the Scottish people be left with Scotland, hence advocating the need for an independent Scottish Parliament. Proposals for the same were brought forward shortly thereafter in 1995. On its assumption of power in 1997, the Tony Blair Administration heralded some dramatic changes to the very fabric and structure of British Politics . Perhaps the most significant of those changes is the Scotland Act 1998. Scotland thereafter regained its own Parliament and administration since 1707. The 1998 Act empowered the Scottish Parliament to deliberate and decide as well as enact laws on matters concerning Scots and Scotland. These matters are referred to as ‘Devolved Matters’. They are generally matters of domestic importance. The Scottish Parliament was officially opened by HM The Queen on 1st July 1999. Besides being empowered to pass bills relating to domestic issues such as education, Gaelic, health and housing the Scottish Parliament was also equipped with limited powers to vary the United Kingdom income tax rate to enable Scotland raise its own finances. This has been referred to as the “Tartan Tax” . The Scottish Parliament also took over policies which previously concerned the Scottish Office. The Parliament may decide on devolved matters but other matters such as international affairs, foreign policies, defence and social security remain within the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom’s Government and Parliament. These matters are known as “Reserved Matters”. It is apt to assert that the Scottish Parliament’s powers are devolutionary. The question therefore naturally arises; what is devolution? It is not unlike delegation of powers, should one choose to adopt such a view. Succinctly put, the Scottish Parliament has been empowered by the Westminster Parliament to make decisions at grass root level concerning matters at a level closer to the governed. Absolute power however continues to reside with Westminster. Thus the UK Parliament and Government may still decide on all matters concerning Scotland even such matters as are considered devolved; social work, police and fire services, environment, education and training, natural and built heritage, statistics and public records amongst others. It bears mentioning however that on such occasions, the Westminster Parliament is required first to seek and obtain the Scottish Parliament’s approval in deciding on devolved matters. 9 years on, it is worth examining what, if any, advantages as well as disadvantages are attributable to the Scottish Parliament.
Advantages of the Scottish Parliment:
Disadvantages of the Scottish Parliment:1. Insufficient Power: It has been argued that devolution has failed to work as there is great limitation to what the Scottish Parliament may deliberate and decide upon without Westminster’s intrusion. As the United Kingdom still decides on the annual limit policy on immigration, hence Scotland’s population growth and long term economic investments amongst other things, it is deemed that perhaps the Scottish Parliament’s devolutionary powers are not nearly enough. 2. Tension between the Westminster and Scottish Parliaments: In the UK however, some of the recent benefits mentioned as introduced by the Scottish National Party since becoming the first majority party in 2007 are seen as an unfair advantage on the United Kingdom and the tax payers therein, as an exploitation of devolution. Some have gone as far as referring to some of these benefits in particular talk of abolishing prescription prices as nothing but an extreme case of post code lottery at the expense of the British tax payers. 3. Admittedly, Scotland is blessed with its own revenue generation from oil and gas as well as tourism. However as Westminster decides on international affairs, hence international trade, the revenue allocation is to a large extent determined by the Westminster Parliament. The Scottish Parliament lacks absolute control over how such revenues are disbursed judiciously amongst its own people. The economy, defence vis-à-vis Iraq as well as foreign policy remains key issues for Scotland’s Parliament. The fact that the Scottish Parliament has no autonomy over international matters (reserved matters) restricts, to a significant extent, its ability to expand on the world trade market. 4. There appears to remain some overlapping in determining what constitutes devolution and what does not. Scottish Members of Parliament in Westminster appear to be able to vote on issues affecting only England such as school fees, medical fees and the likes, while back home in Scotland, the National Party has abolished most or all of these fees for Scots. This would appear as yet another unfair advantage of Scotland having its own Parliament over the British tax payers. It is indeed arguable that the Scottish Parliament ought only to vote on matters affecting Scotland and vice versa. 5. Perhaps by far the most dis-advantageous of all aspects of devolution or of Scotland having its own Parliament is the fact that it does nothing to disguise it, rather it seeks to magnify the fact that the Scotland Parliament lacks autonomy on matters both devolved and reserved. The Scottish Parliament indeed affords the Scottish people better governance, better social amenities, more attention on domestic matters and revenue generation and allocation to a reasonable extent. The Scottish people are in many ways the better for it. On the issue of lack of autonomy however and the background tension between the Westminster Parliament and the Scottish Parliament, it would appear to be small prices to pay for the independence of Scotland’s Parliament. They are matters which are not impossible to be better managed. Perhaps it would also be productive to allow the Scottish Parliament more powers in matters considered reserved with appropriate principles of checks and balances resting with the Westminster Parliament. Bibliography1. K. M. Brown and R. J. Tanner (eds), The History of the Scottish Parliament, volume 1: Parliament and Politics, 1235-1560 (Edinburgh, 2004) 2. A. A. M. Duncan, ‘The early parliaments of Scotland’ in The Scottish Historical Review, 45 (1966), pp.36-57. 3. J. Goodare, ‘The Scottish Parliamentary records, 1560-1603’ in Historical Research, 72 (1999), pp.244-67. 4. ‘The Scottish Parliament’ 17308 3rd edition, January 2008 5. Robert Hazell ‘The English Question’ 2006 pp. 24-68. |

